Comparison of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar vertebral bone quality scores for increased utility of bone mineral density screening
European Spine Journal, ISSN: 1432-0932, Vol: 32, Issue: 1, Page: 20-26
2023
- 20Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Purpose: To evaluate the associations among the validated lumbar vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, and cervical and thoracic VBQ scores. Methods: Radiographic records of 100 patients who underwent synchronous MRI of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were retrieved. DEXA-validated lumbar VBQ was calculated using median signal intensity (MSI) of the L1–L4 vertebrae and L3 CSF. VBQ was derived as the quotient of MSI divided by MSI. Cervical and thoracic VBQ were similarly obtained using C3–C6 and C5 CSF, and T5–T8 and T7 CSF, respectively. Paired sample t-tests were used to evaluate differences among regional VBQ scores. Independent sample t-tests were used to identify sex differences in VBQ. Regression models with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were constructed to identify associations among all permutations of anthropometric and regional VBQ measures. Results: Mean cervical, thoracic, and lumbar VBQ scores were 3.06 ± 0.89, 2.60 ± 0.77, and 2.47 ± 0.61, respectively. Mean differences of.127 (p = 0.045) and − 0.595 (p < 0.001) were observed between thoracic and lumbar, and cervical and lumbar VBQ scores. Correlations of 0.324, 0.356, and 0.600 (p < 0.001) were found between cervical and lumbar, cervical and thoracic, and thoracic and lumbar VBQ scores. Regression with ANOVA predicting lumbar VBQ in relation to cervical and thoracic VBQ demonstrated R Square values of 0.105 and 0.360 (p < 0.001), and β coefficient values of 0.471 and 0.217 (p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Thoracic VBQ provides values representative of the validated lumbar VBQ score. Cervical VBQ scores are distinct from lumbar VBQ scores and do not provide adequate surrogate values of lumbar VBQ.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143762082&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36509887; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-022-07484-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know