Treatment of critical-sized bone defects: clinical and tissue engineering perspectives
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, ISSN: 1432-1068, Vol: 28, Issue: 3, Page: 351-362
2018
- 304Citations
- 463Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations304
- Citation Indexes303
- 303
- CrossRef132
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures463
- Readers463
- 462
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
VEGF as Alveolar Bone Regeneration Key Protein in SHED Secretome, Hydroxyapatite and Collagen Type 1 Scaffold: An In-Silico Study
Dini Rachmawati1,2, Tania Saskianti3*, Rini Devijanti Ridwan4, Nenny Prasetyaningrum5,6, Masami Kanawa7 1Doctoral Program, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, 60132, Indonesia. 2Department
Review Description
Critical-sized bone defects are defined as those that will not heal spontaneously within a patient’s lifetime. Current treatment options include vascularized bone grafts, distraction osteogenesis, and the induced membrane technique. The induced membrane technique is an increasingly utilized method with favorable results including high rates of union. Tissue engineering holds promise in the treatment of large bone defects due to advancement of stem cell biology, novel biomaterials, and 3D bioprinting. In this review, we provide an overview of the current operative treatment strategies of critical-sized bone defects as well as the current state of tissue engineering for such defects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85032331756&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29080923; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00590-017-2063-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know