The evaluation of the safety and efficacy of intravenously administered allogeneic multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring cells in a swine hepatectomy model
Surgery Today, ISSN: 1436-2813, Vol: 51, Issue: 4, Page: 634-650
2021
- 12Citations
- 23Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 11
- CrossRef1
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
- Mentions2
- References2
- 2
Article Description
Introduction: Multilineage-differentiating stress-enduring (Muse) cells are non-tumorigenic endogenous pluripotent-like cells residing in the bone marrow that exert a tissue reparative effect by replacing damaged/apoptotic cells through spontaneous differentiation into tissue-constituent cells. Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is a potentially fatal complication. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficiency of allogeneic Muse cell administration via the portal vein in a swine model of PHLF. Methods: Swine Muse cells, collected from swine bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) as SSEA-3(+) cells, were examined for their characteristics. Then, 1 × 10 allogeneic-Muse cells and allogeneic-MSCs and vehicle were injected via the portal vein in a 70% hepatectomy swine model. Results: Swine Muse cells exhibited characteristics comparable to previously reported human Muse cells. Compared to the MSC and vehicle groups, the Muse group showed specific homing of the administered cells into the liver, resulting in improvements in the control of hyperbilirubinemia (P = 0.04), prothrombin international normalized ratio (P = 0.05), and suppression of focal necrosis (P = 0.04). Integrated Muse cells differentiated spontaneously into hepatocyte marker-positive cells. Conclusions: Allogeneic Muse cell administration may provide a reparative effect and functional recovery in a 70% hepatectomy swine model and thus may contribute to the treatment of PHLF.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85090578218&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02117-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32915286; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00595-020-02117-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02117-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00595-020-02117-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know