Phylogenetic relationships of Thinopyrum and Triticum species revealed by SCoT and CDDP markers
Plant Systematics and Evolution, ISSN: 1615-6110, Vol: 302, Issue: 9, Page: 1301-1309
2016
- 24Citations
- 22Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To evaluate the phylogenetic relationships among Thinopyrum species and Triticum species, 7 accessions of Thinopyrum species (2 Th. bessarabicum, 1 Th. elongatum, 2 Th. intermedium and 2. Th. ponticum), 11 accessions of Triticum species (2 Aeglips tauschii, 1 T. monococcum, 1 T. turgidum, 2 T. timopheevii and 5 T. aestivum) together with Hordeum vulgare cv. Golden were analysed using 17 SCoT and 10 CDDP markers. The mean number of observed alleles was 8.5 and 6.6 among the species for SCoT and CDDP markers, respectively. Based on the genetic data produced by the SCoT and CDDP markers, cluster analysis among Thinopyrum species, Triticum species and Hordeum was performed to generate dendrograms. The genetic relationships among Thinopyrum species, Triticum species and H. vulgare revealed by the SCoT markers were in agreement with the results of the CDDP markers. On both dendrograms, these species formed three clusters. The results indicated that Thinopyrum species and Triticum species were the most closely related, whereas H. vulgare was relatively distant from both genera. In addition, seven markers, i.e. SCoT 9, SCoT 31, SCoT 34, WRKY-R1, WRKY-R2, MADS-1 and MADS-4 were developed for monitoring introgression of Thinopyrum chromosomes or chromosome segments into Triticum species.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84979276161&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00606-016-1332-4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know