The learning curve for endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas. A single institution experience, Leeds, UK
Acta Neurochirurgica, ISSN: 0942-0940, Vol: 160, Issue: 1, Page: 39-47
2018
- 13Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Background: The object of this study was to assess whether increasing operative experience results in greater endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenomas and lower complications. Methods: A retrospective single institution cohort study was performed. Subjects underwent endoscopic trans-sphenoidal resection of pituitary macroadenoma between July 2009 and July 2016 by three neurosurgeons. Following data collection, statistical analysis compared percentage of tumor resection and length of hospital stay (LOS) with experience. Complications including CSF leak are reported. Results: In total, 142 patients (87 male, 55 female) mean age 55.1 were included. Surgeon 1 performed 106 cases; surgeon 2 performed 23 cases; and surgeon 3 performed 13 cases. Mean pre-operative tumor volumes were 8.18 cm, 6.52 cm, and 3.47 cm and post-operative volumes were 2.21, 1.74, and 1.93 cm for surgeons 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Respective percentage resections were 74.3, 77.2, and 52.1%. Analysis demonstrated no difference in tumor resection with increasing experience for all three surgeons (p = 0.11, p = 0.17, and p = 0.26). Tumor consistency and cavernous sinus involvement did not appear to affect tumor resection. Mean LOS was 5 days, 4 days, and 3 days, respectively, with no significant correlation with experience for all three surgeons. Intraoperative CSF leak incidence was 19/106 (18%) for surgeon 1, 6/23(26%) for surgeon 2, and 2/13(15%) for surgeon 3. Primary closure rate was 96.3% and only three other complications occurred. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in our institution there is no statistically significant learning curve for the endoscopic resection of pituitary macroadenoma. However, there is a trend of improvement in tumor resection with experience for one surgeon. These findings suggest that the surgeons in our institution were capable of performing this procedure effectively with a low complication rate since adoption of the endoscopic technique in 2009.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85031906201&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3355-1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29063272; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00701-017-3355-1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3355-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00701-017-3355-1
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know