Spatiotemporal variations of photosynthetically active radiation and the influencing factors in China from 1961 to 2016
Theoretical and Applied Climatology, ISSN: 1434-4483, Vol: 137, Issue: 3-4, Page: 2049-2067
2019
- 12Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Daily measurements of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and other meteorological parameters at 16 stations in China during 2005–2015 were used to develop the all-weather Adaptive-Network-based Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) PAR models. The ANFIS models were compared with other semi-empirical and semi-physical methods, and the results showed that ANFIS models using global solar radiation (G) as input parameter provided more accurate estimates than other models. Daily PAR values during 1961–2016 were reconstructed using meteorological parameters at 908 meteorological stations, and the spatiotemporal characteristics of PAR in China were analyzed. The daily PAR ranged from 20.03 to 36.29 mol m day with annual mean value being about 29.03 mol m day in China during 1961–2016. The PAR values were generally higher in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau (QTP) and Inner Mongolian Plateau (IMP) and lower in Northeast and Southeast China, especially in the Sichuan Basin. PAR decreased in most part of China, especially in Northeast China, with the minimum value being about − 0.11 mol m day year during 1961–2016. The increasing trend only appeared in Southwest China with the maximum value being about 0.02 mol m day year. Annual mean daily G, PAR fraction (F, the ratio of PAR and G), sunshine duration (SSD), relative humidity (RH), and water pressure (MP) were further analyzed to find the influencing parameters for PAR. The results showed that G, F, and SSD were the major factors for influencing PAR in most part of China, but in some areas, RH and MP influenced the PAR more effectively. Finally, the monthly variations of aerosol optical depth (AOD) in the Yangtze River Basin gathered from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Level 3 Atmosphere Product during 2002–2016 were analyzed, which was one important factors influencing the PAR values in summer and winter months.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85057610385&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00704-018-2727-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know