A closed-form yield criterion for porous materials with Mises–Schleicher–Burzyński matrix containing cylindrical voids
Acta Mechanica, ISSN: 1619-6937, Vol: 232, Issue: 4, Page: 1285-1306
2021
- 5Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This work develops a closed-form yield criterion applicable to porous materials with pressure-dependent matrix presenting tension–compression asymmetry (Mises–Schleicher–Burzyński material) containing parallel cylindrical voids. To develop the strength criterion, the stress-based variational homogenization approach due to Cheng et al. (Int J Plast 55:133–151, 2014) is extended to the case of a hollow cylinder under generalized plane strain conditions subjected to axisymmetric loading. Adopting a strictly statically admissible trial stress field, the homogenization procedure results in an approximate yield locus depending on the current material porosity, tension–compression material asymmetry, the mean lateral stress, and an equivalent shear stress. The analytical criterion provides exact solutions for purely hydrostatic loading. Theoretical results are compared with finite element (FE) simulations considering cylindrical unit-cells with distinct porosity levels, different values of the tension–compression asymmetry, and a wide range of stress triaxialities. Based on comparisons, the theoretical results are found to be in good agreement with FE simulations for most of the loading conditions and material features considered in this study. More accurate theoretical predictions are provided when higher material porosities and/or lower tension–compression asymmetries are considered. Overall, the main outcome of this work is a closed-form yield function proving fairly accurate predictions to engineering applications, in which pressure-dependent and tension–compression asymmetric porous materials with cylindrical voids are dealt with. This can be the case of honeycomb structures or additively manufactured materials, in which metal matrix composites are employed.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100535489&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00707-020-02925-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know