Fulfilling the information needs of cancer patients: Use of a question prompt list at the premedication consultation
Onkologe, ISSN: 1433-0415, Vol: 22, Issue: 11, Page: 864-869
2016
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In oncology, little is known about which questions patients have about anesthesia and how well these are answered in the premedication consultation. A question prompt list for patients of anesthesia (QPL-A) with good psychometric properties was developed by the authors. Used prior to consultation to measure the information needs of cancer patients in the authors’ anesthesia department, patients indicated their need for information on 4 scales: (1) “Anesthesia procedure and effects” QPL-A-E (α = 0.92), (2) “Anesthesia safety” QPL-A-S (α = 0.86), (3) “Advice concerning preanesthetic behavior” QPL-A-B (α = 0.85) and (4) “Anesthetists actions” QPL-A-A (α = 0.79). Patients rated the importance of being provided answers (nominal value) and completed the State Trait Operation Anxiety (STOA) Inventory. After consultation, patients completed the question answering list (QAL-A) asking how far the anesthetist answered the patients’ anesthesia-related questions (actual value) and again the STOA inventory. The provision of safety-related (QPL-A-S) as well as procedure- and effects-related information (QPL-A-E) about the anesthesia were very important to patients, while understanding behavior changings (e. g. stop smoking) was less important to patients. QPL and QAL values are partly contrary in terms of nominal–actual differences: 71 % of patients indicated that they received insufficient information about anesthesia safety, while 56 % of patients received more information than they wanted about necessary behavioral changes. QPL-A-E, QPL-A-B, and QPL-A-A positively correlated with obtaining information, but safety-related information needs were not associated with the amount of information that the patient received. The QPL-A can be used with cancer patients to help improve the premedication consultation quality.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84991087009&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00761-016-0123-4
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know