How should we proceed with the standardization in case of allergen determination?
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, ISSN: 0949-1775, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 119-125
2013
- 3Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Allergens cannot at present be measured with the trueness that attends the analysis of well-characterized chemical entities such as mycotoxins where the analytes are defined and identical in sample and calibrator. By nature, allergens are nearly always a mixture of different proteins with different mass fractions of each single protein. Allergens are furthermore in a commodity with different total protein contents in the presence of an unknown matrix. To circumvent these difficulties, reference materials for allergens would be useful but until now not realized due to biological variabilities of the materials, and the contradiction between medical issues and declaration of foods due to legislation. Examples for standardization efforts are given which are (1) peanut where a common reference material not intended for allergen determination is used and (2) gluten/gliadin where the extraction procedure, the antibody and a calibrator are standardized but proficiency tests are not fit-for-purpose due to inhomogeneity of the testing material. Furthermore, the analytical minimum requirements and the declaration of egg-white proteins, caseins and lysozyme in wine are reviewed. To show one negative example for standardization efforts, milk is discussed. The possibilities and limits of reference materials for the standardization of allergen determinations are discussed. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875408570&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-013-0965-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know