Comparison of exact matching and calibration curve quantification methods for glucose in human serum GC-IDMS analysis and their application for the development of certified reference materials
Accreditation and Quality Assurance, ISSN: 0949-1775, Vol: 20, Issue: 6, Page: 483-493
2015
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The establishment of a precise and accurate method for the determination of the analyte is the first step in the development of certified reference materials (CRMs), which play a key role in metrological traceability. To assist the production of a glucose CRM in human serum for clinical chemistry routine tests, we developed a gas chromatography-isotope dilution mass spectrometry method using trimethylsilylation and performed two calibration techniques: exact matching approach and calibration curve. Performance of the method and calibration techniques were evaluated for their suitability for the characterization of a CRM candidate carrying out studies to assign the property value and to assure homogeneity as well as short- and long-term stability. Both calibration approaches were equivalent in terms of accuracy and precision and presented bias lower than 1.0 % with relative standard deviations lower than 3.0 %. Relative measurement uncertainties obtained with the exact matching approach calibration method were between 1.0 % and 2.5 % and were lower than the ones obtained with calibration curve method. This finding justifies the use of the time-consuming exact matching method for the assignment of the property value, while the calibration curve procedure suits the other certification studies.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know