Three-dimensional lower extremity alignment in the weight-bearing standing position in healthy elderly subjects
Journal of Orthopaedic Science, ISSN: 0949-2658, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 64-70
2010
- 55Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations55
- Citation Indexes55
- 55
- CrossRef45
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Article Description
Although assessment of lower extremity alignment is important for the treatment and evaluation of diseases that present with malalignment of the lower extremity, it has generally been performed using only plain radiographs seen in two dimensions (2D). In addition, there is no consensus regarding the criteria for quantitative three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the relative angle between the femur and tibia. The purpose of this study was to establish assessment methods and criteria for quantitatively evaluating lower extremity alignment in 3D and to obtain reference data from normal elderly subjects.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S094926581532008X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1414-z; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77249130437&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20151253; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S094926581532008X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1414-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s00776-009-1414-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s00776-009-1414-z
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know