Interactively discovering and ranking desired tuples by data exploration
VLDB Journal, ISSN: 0949-877X, Vol: 31, Issue: 4, Page: 753-777
2022
- 9Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Data exploration—the problem of extracting knowledge from database even if we do not know exactly what we are looking for —is important for data discovery and analysis. However, precisely specifying SQL queries is not always practical, such as “finding and ranking off-road cars based on a combination of Price, Make, Model, Age, Mileage, etc”—not only due to the query complexity (e.g.,the queries may have many if-then-else, and, or and not logic), but also because the user typically does not have the knowledge of all data instances (and their variants). We propose DExPlorer, a system for interactive data exploration. From the user perspective, we propose a simple and user-friendly interface, which allows to: (1) confirm whether a tuple is desired or not, and (2) decide whether a tuple is more preferred than another. Behind the scenes, we jointly use multiple ML models to learn from the above two types of user feedback. Moreover, in order to effectively involve human-in-the-loop, we need to select a set of tuples for each user interaction so as to solicit feedback. Therefore, we devise question selection algorithms, which consider not only the estimated benefit of each tuple, but also the possible partial orders between any two suggested tuples. Experiments on real-world datasets show that DExPlorer outperforms existing approaches in effectiveness.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know