Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions
Clinical Oral Investigations, ISSN: 1436-3771, Vol: 18, Issue: 4, Page: 1229-1236
2014
- 66Citations
- 76Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations66
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef25
- Captures76
- Readers76
- 76
Article Description
Objectives: The present study compares the diagnostic value of periodontal bone defect images using conventional two-dimensional single-tooth radiographs and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. Materials and methods: Classified periodontal bone defects were prepared on pig mandibles and presented radiographically. Fifteen dentists were instructed to make a diagnosis based on these x-rays, regarding the type and the extent of the bone defects. Subsequently, the results were evaluated and compared to the morphology of the surgically prepared defects as the gold standard. Results: On average, the diagnosis of infrabony defects were 21 %, dehiscence 25 %, and fenestration 33 % more accurate using the three-dimensional projection than with the single-tooth radiograph. Furthermore, the CBCT allows grade II furcation to be captured more accurately. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a considerably more precise analysis of periodontal defects is possible due to the third dimension. Particularly, in the oro-vestibular orientation, defects could be detected significantly more accurate. Clinical relevance: CBCT images offer an advantageous alternative to the conventional single-tooth radiograph while taking the higher exposure of radiation into account. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84899953254&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24048949; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know