Cyano or o-nitrophenyl? Which is the optimal electron-withdrawing group for the acrylic acid acceptor of D-π-A sensitizers in DSSCs? A density functional evaluation
Journal of Molecular Modeling, ISSN: 1610-2940, Vol: 19, Issue: 4, Page: 1597-1604
2013
- 35Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations35
- Citation Indexes35
- 35
- CrossRef23
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
We report a DFT, TDDFT and DFTB investigation of the performance of two donor-π-acceptor (D-π-A)-type organic dyes bearing different electron-withdrawing groups (EWG) for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) to evaluate which EWG is better for an acrylic acid acceptor, i.e., Cyano (-CN) or o-nitrophenyl (o-NO-Ph). A series of theoretical criteria applied successfully in our previous work to explain the different performance of organic dyes related to open-circuit photovoltage (V) and short-circuit current density (J) were used to evaluate the performance of the dyes with just different EWG. Our calculated results reveal that dye 2 with o-NO-Ph has a larger vertical dipole moment, more electrons transferred from the dye to the semiconductor and a lower degree of charge recombination, which could lead to larger V ; while the larger driving force and comparable light harvesting efficiency could lead to higher J, highlighting the potential of o-NO-Ph as an EWG in an acrylic acid acceptor. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876410294&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1719-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23274530; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00894-012-1719-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00894-012-1719-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00894-012-1719-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know