Long-Term Leaf Production Response to Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Tropospheric Ozone
Ecosystems, ISSN: 1432-9840, Vol: 15, Issue: 1, Page: 71-82
2012
- 15Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Elevated concentrations of atmospheric CO and tropospheric O will profoundly influence future forest productivity, but our understanding of these influences over the long-term is poor. Leaves are key indicators of productivity and we measured the mass, area, and nitrogen concentration of leaves collected in litter traps from 2002 to 2008 in three young northern temperate forest communities exposed to elevated CO and/or elevated O since 1998. On average, the overall effect of elevated CO (+CO and +CO +O versus ambient and +O ) was to increase leaf mass by 36% whereas the overall effect of elevated O was to decrease leaf mass by 13%, with similar effects on stand leaf area. However, there were important CO × O × year interactions wherein some treatment effects on leaf mass changed dramatically relative to ambient from 2002 to 2008. For example, stimulation by the +CO treatment decreased (from +52 to +25%), whereas the deleterious effects of the +O treatment increased (from -5 to -18%). In comparison, leaf mass in the +CO +O treatment was similar to ambient throughout the study. Forest composition influenced these responses: effects of the +O treatment on community-level leaf mass ranged from +2 to -19%. These findings are evidence that community composition, stand development processes, CO , and O strongly interact. Changes in leaf nitrogen concentration were inconsistent, but leaf nitrogen mass (g m ) was increased by elevated CO (+30%) and reduced by elevated O (-16%), consistent with observations that nitrogen cycling is accelerated by elevated CO but retarded by elevated O . © 2011 Springer Science and Business Media (outside the USA).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84856533202&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z/fulltext.html; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10021-011-9493-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know