The use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, Phasix™) mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hernia, ISSN: 1248-9204, Vol: 28, Issue: 4, Page: 989-1004
2024
- 4Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
- Mentions4
- News Mentions4
- 4
Most Recent News
Hernia Mesh: General Surgeons Slow to Move on From Synthetic Mesh
Vigna Law Group Share This Article Dr. Greg Vigna P4HB mesh proves safe and effective in ventral hernia repairs, with low recurrence and complications, offering
Review Description
Purpose/background: Despite the growing use of bioabsorbable mesh in ventral hernia repairs (VHR), the evidence of its impact on patient outcomes remains limited. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh for ventral hernia repair through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A literature search of five databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Medline, and Google Scholar) produced a list of publications that analyzed the use of P4HB mesh in ventral hernia repair in both clean and contaminated cases. The primary postoperative outcomes of hernia recurrence, surgical site infections (SSI), and any complications were analyzed through a pooled meta-analysis. Results: In our systematic review, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 1858 patients (933 males and 925 females) and an average age of 56.8 years. The median follow-up ranged from 1.6 to 62.3 months. In our meta-analysis, the use of P4HB mesh in VHR in proportion of events demonstrated a recurrence rate of 9% [6%; 15%], SSI of 10% [6%; 16%] and 35% [9%; 42%] for rate of any complications. Sub-meta-analysis restricted to studies with follow up > 18 months continues to show low rates of recurrence of 9% (95%CI, 4–17%), SSI of 9% (95%CI, 4–16%), and 31% (95%CI, 23–41%) for any complications. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the use of P4HB mesh is both safe and effective in ventral hernia repairs. When further analyzed past 18 months, the time where P4HB mesh fully resorbs, the rates of hernia recurrence, SSI, and any complications remain low of upwards of 5 years and comparable to the rates seen in synthetic and biologics in similar patient populations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85188258017&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38512507; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know