Infected native knee joint: Diagnostics and treatment regimen
Trauma und Berufskrankheit, ISSN: 1436-6282, Vol: 21, Issue: 4, Page: 223-230
2019
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
A knee joint infection is considered a surgical emergency, which if left untreated can lead to irreversible joint destruction and poor functional outcome. Etiologically, a distinction is made between endogenous and exogenous causes as well as early and late infections. The general incidence is low but increases with the proportion of implanted foreign material. Bacterial infection and the associated release of the body’s own cytokines and lysosomal proteins already leads to cartilage damage within 48 h. The combination of clinical, histopathological and microbiological results flanked by laboratory values and imaging leads to the diagnosis. Treatment includes the surgical cleansing of the infection combined with administration of antibiotics. Infections of a previously healthy knee joint are treated arthroscopically, whereby a one-stage intervention is usually sufficient. An infection after cruciate ligament transplantation is also treated arthroscopically and not uncommonly by a multistage procedure. The transplants can be preserved if they are intraoperatively stable. The treatment of choice for peri-implant infections with consolidated fractures is arthroscopic debridement and implant removal. In cases of nonconsolidated fractures and early infections, preservation of osteosynthesis can be achieved by performing revision surgery; however, a late infection usually requires a two-stage procedure. The initially calculated antibiotic treatment is adjusted accordingly when the antibiogram and resistogram are completed. The duration of antibiotic treatment varies from 6 weeks for an infection of a previously healthy knee to 12 weeks for a peri-implant infection.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know