A framework and simple decision support tool for groundwater contamination assessment in an urban redevelopment precinct
Hydrogeology Journal, ISSN: 1435-0157, Vol: 27, Issue: 6, Page: 1911-1928
2019
- 4Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Overcoming barriers to large-scale urban redevelopment on brownfield land is an essential step in the global drive toward achieving the UN’s sustainable development goals. Arguably the most significant barrier is site contamination. Decision support tools (DSTs) are potentially effective ways to assess contaminated sites and evaluate different remediation/management strategies as appropriate to local conditions. Whilst there has been extensive development of DSTs for single contaminated sites, only a limited number are available for assessing contamination at the ‘precinct’ (district) scale. This paper presents a framework and simple DST for the assessment of contaminated groundwater, using Australia’s largest urban redevelopment project, Fishermans Bend in Melbourne, as a case study. The value of the inclusion of precinct-wide data into individual site-scale investigations is demonstrated via the DST. Common contaminant sources identified across Fishermans Bend include fill contaminated with heavy metals, legacy landfill leachate containing heavy metals and per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and naturally occurring ammonia and methane in organic-rich sediments. By comparison, point sources of heavy metals and PFAS appear related to industrial sources. By using the DST, environmental practitioners and auditors can more effectively separate background conditions from point sources, characterise the ambient conditions of the aquifer and their relationships to natural and anthropogenic processes, and use contaminant data to inform remedial options assessment. Where these increasingly complex and varied environmental datasets can be collected, stored and managed within one central database, cross- or inter-disciplinary collaborations may drive improvements in solving environmental problems which typically arise during the redevelopment process.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know