Early detection of sepsis—the emergency services’ perspective: Challenges in diagnosis and treatment
Notfall und Rettungsmedizin, ISSN: 1436-0578, Vol: 22, Issue: 3, Page: 189-197
2019
- 2Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Sepsis is a life-threatening (multi)organ dysfunction caused by the host’s immune overreaction to an infection. Contrary to other important prehospital events such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, severe trauma, myocardial infarction or stroke, sepsis is difficult to diagnose and often lacks precise algorithms for diagnosis and treatment. Thus, the diagnostic pathway and rapid initiation of a goal-directed therapy are often delayed. Since publication of the revised Sepsis-3 criteria, qSOFA is the recommended screening tool for sepsis and includes the following three elements: level of consciousness, respiratory rate and systolic blood pressure. Sepsis bundles (diagnostic tests and therapeutic measures within certain time limits) should also be implemented in the prehospital environment. However, changes are necessary concerning diagnostic algorithms and prehospital logistics. Additional diagnostic tests such as a bedside lactate level or end-tidal CO measurements may also further improve future prehospital sepsis diagnosis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048362476&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10049-018-0468-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know