Monthly in-house reports using the AKTIN Emergency Department Data Registry: advantages of standardised key figures: Development and implementation of a reporting system based on emergency department medical record data
Notfall und Rettungsmedizin, ISSN: 1436-0578, Vol: 26, Issue: 6, Page: 416-425
2023
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: With increasing utilisation and current changes in German emergency care, standardised recording of relevant key figures in emergency departments (EDs) is crucial. Objectives: Consensus of key figures and technical implementation of an automated reporting for EDs that participate in the AKTIN Emergency Department Data Registry are described. The aim was a balanced monthly report for medical controlling and quality management of an ED. Materials and methods: The basis is the Emergency Department Medical Record V2015.1 of the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (DIVI). Consensus on key figures was reached based on external references and professional expertise. The technical development was based on a test dataset. The final report is created in PDF format automatically using R and Apache Formatting Objects Processor (FOP). Results: The report contains, for example, information on case numbers, patient demographics, presenting complaints, acuity assessment, disposition and selected process indicators, presented as tables and graphs. It is generated automatically from the routine data on a monthly basis or on request. Missing values and outliers are shown separately in order to assess data quality. Conclusions: The monthly AKTIN report is an instrument that summarises and visualises the work load and care provided in an ED. The key figures are a suitable and pragmatic approach and also reflect the requirements of the Federal Joint Committee for initial acuity assessment. The use of interoperability standards allows for the use of routine medical data, ensures independence from individual information technology (IT) systems and may serve as a basis for cross-institutional benchmarking.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know