Intersecting realms: a cross-disciplinary examination of VR quality of experience research
Virtual Reality, ISSN: 1434-9957, Vol: 28, Issue: 3
2024
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
The advent of virtual reality (VR) technology has necessitated a reevaluation of quality of experience (QoE) models. While numerous recent efforts have been dedicated to creating comprehensive QoE frameworks it seems that the majority of the factors studied as potential influencers of QoE are often limited to single disciplinary viewpoints or specific user-related aspects. Furthermore, the majority of literature reviews in this domain seem to have predominantly focused on academic sources, overlooking industry insights. To address these points, the current research took an interdisciplinary literature review approach to examine QoE literature covering both academic and industry sources from diverse fields (i.e., psychology, ergonomics, user experience, communication science, and engineering). Based on this rich dataset, we created a QoE model that illustrated 252 factors grouped into four branches - user, system, context, and content. The main finding of this review emphasized the substantial gap in the current research landscape, where complex interactions among user, system, context, and content factors in VR are overlooked. The current research not only identified this crucial disparity in existing QoE studies but also provided a substantial online repository of over 200 QoE-related factors. The repository serves as an indispensable tool for future researchers aiming to construct a more holistic understanding of QoE.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know