An interpretable framework for the hazard assessment of debris flow based on an improved AHP-EWM method and the SHAP model: a case study of Heishuiwan gully
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, ISSN: 1435-9537, Vol: 82, Issue: 12
2023
- 4Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Debris flows are significant geological hazard in Beijing mountainous areas. As a non-engineering means, hazard assessment is instructive for debris flow prevention and control. A rational assessment framework should not only sufficiently describe various attributes of the debris flow system but also provide objective and reasonable hazard zoning results, along with interpretive analysis of the assessment outcomes. In this study, the debris flow located at Heishuiwan Gully in Beijing was taken as a case study for debris flow hazard assessment. The combination of an improved AHP-EWM method and the SHAP model was successfully applied to develop an interpretable framework for hazard assessment of a single-gully debris flow, including the relative weight calculation and interaction effect analysis of the assessment indicators. The reliability of the improved AHP-EWM method was quantitatively validated by comparing with the numerical simulation results of FLO-2D. The rationality of indicator selection was explained through the SHAP model. The hazard zoning result obtained from the AHP-EWM method was consistent with that of FLO-2D, with a nearly linear relationship between the area of high-risk zones and rainfall intensity. The analysis using the SHAP model revealed that elevation had the most significant impact on debris flow hazard due to its synergistic effect with other evaluation factors. This interpretable hazard assessment framework can provide targeted guidance and recommendations for the prevention and control of single-gully debris flows.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know