Utility of published guidelines on the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the elderly
Clinical Rheumatology, ISSN: 0770-3198, Vol: 27, Issue: 9, Page: 1191-1194
2008
- 17Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef11
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Canadian Consensus guidelines regarding appropriate use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) were recently published. This study was done to evaluate the application of these guidelines on NSAID practice patterns in frail elderly patients referred to a specialist Geriatric Assessment Clinic. A retrospective chart review was undertaken of referrals who were currently prescribed NSAIDs. Data were captured on age, sex, weight, diagnoses, medications and dosages, indication for NSAID treatment, lying BP (as assessed in the clinic) and recent serum creatinine result. Creatinine clearance was subsequently calculated use the Cockcroft-Gault equation. Complete data were available on 107 patients (68% women, average age 80.6 years). Thirty percent were on a traditional NSAID, the remainder were on a Coxib. Concomitant aspirin was prescribed in 37%. Cytoprotection was being used in 38% and did not increase appreciably in patients with additional risk factors for GI toxicity, i.e., concomitant aspirin usage(35%), and history of GI toxicity (48%). Sixty-seven were taking anti-hypertensive medications, although more than two thirds of these patients were uncontrolled. Newly diagnosed hypertension was present in 19.6%. Calculated creatinine clearance revealed moderate to severe renal impairment in 79% of subjects, although serum creatinine was only elevated in 18%. In total, 70% of subjects were found to have relative or absolute risk factors for NSAID therapy. Given the high prevalence of potential contraindications to anti-inflammatory drug usage in this study, we advocate the dissemination and application of these guidelines in geriatric patients in an attempt to reduce potential morbidity and mortality. © Clinical Rheumatology 2008.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=48449092690&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18607671; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10067-008-0952-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know