Meta-analysis of associations between functional prolactin −1149 G/T polymorphism and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus
Clinical Rheumatology, ISSN: 1434-9949, Vol: 34, Issue: 4, Page: 683-690
2015
- 14Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- CrossRef14
- 14
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
The aim of this study was to determine whether the prolactin −1149 G/T polymorphism confers susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A meta-analysis was conducted for examining the associations between prolactin −1149 G/T polymorphism and susceptibility to SLE or RA using allele contrast, recessive and dominant models, and homozygote contrast. A total of 10 comparative studies, consisting of 4 SLE and 6 RA studies, involving 4252 patients and 4949 controls, were included in the meta-analysis. No association between the prolactin −1149 G allele and SLE was found when all study subjects were considered together (OR = 1.019, 95 % CI = 1.841–1.236, p = 0.845). Stratification by ethnicity also indicated no association between the prolactin G allele and SLE in either Caucasian or Latin American populations. In contrast, a significant association was observed between the prolactin G allele and RA in all subjects (OR = 1.123, 95 % CI = 1.052–1.198, p = 4.6 × 10). After stratification by ethnicity, the G allele was found to be significantly associated with RA in Caucasians (OR = 1.112, 95 % CI = 1.041–1.189, p = 0.002). Furthermore, the prolactin −1149 G/T polymorphism was found to be associated with RA in Caucasians under the dominant model and under homozygote contrast. This meta-analysis demonstrates that the prolactin −1149 G/T polymorphism is associated with susceptibility to RA, but not SLE, in Caucasians.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84925483582&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2904-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25724680; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-015-2904-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-015-2904-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10067-015-2904-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know