Functional manifestations of early knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Rheumatology, ISSN: 1434-9949, Vol: 41, Issue: 9, Page: 2625-2634
2022
- 20Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations20
- Citation Indexes20
- 20
- CrossRef1
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Review Description
Early detection of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) can improve treatment outcomes and prevent its progression. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the functional changes in early KOA. Electronic journal databases and platforms, including PubMed, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus were searched. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies comparing patients with early KOA with an age-matched control group and (2) studies with objectively measured functional changes as outcomes. Studies that included individuals with Kellgren and Lawrence (K/L) grades > 2- were excluded. A random-effects model was constructed to calculate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs). A total of nine articles were included in this systematic review. Seven studies used classification criteria to define early KOA, including knee pain; a K/L grade of 0, 1, or 2- (osteophytes only) for the medial compartment; and the presence of two out of four MRI criteria. The remaining two studies included K/L grade 1 confirmed by radiography. Early KOA participants had a significantly longer timed up-and-go test (TUG) time (pooled SMD: 0.57; 95% confidence interval: 0.15, 0.98). The two groups had similar knee extension muscle strength at 90° knee flexion. The quality of evidence for each measured outcome was “very low.” In this review, longer TUG was identified as a functional manifestation of early KOA. Further studies involving functional assessments are needed to develop a screening method to detect early KOA.• There is a need for diagnostic criteria that include functional changes in patients with early knee osteoarthritis, since radiographic facilities are not available everywhere.• In this review, a long timed up-and-go test time was identified as a functional manifestation of early knee osteoarthritis.• If the findings of this study can be replicated, measurement of TUG may allow for earlier detection of knee osteoarthritis outside the hospital and in routine clinical practice without the use of MRI or X-rays.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85129797663&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06150-x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35554743; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-022-06150-x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06150-x; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10067-022-06150-x
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know