Effectiveness and safety of Belimumab and Telitacicept in systemic lupus erythematosus: a real-world, retrospective, observational study
Clinical Rheumatology, ISSN: 1434-9949, Vol: 44, Issue: 1, Page: 247-256
2025
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Objective: To examine the effectiveness and safety of two different B cell activating factor/proliferation-inducing ligand inhibitors, telitacicept and belimumab, in treating patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods: Patients with active SLE who received belimumab (n = 100) or telitacicept (n = 101) from 2019 to 2023 at multiple centers in China were retrospectively collected, and the effectiveness and safety of telitacicept and belimumab was evaluated. The subgroups of lupus nephritis and hematologic abnormalities were analyzed to explore if there were any differences in the efficacy of the two biologics on improving kidney and blood systems. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to reduce selection bias. Results: No significant between-group differences in patient characteristics were observed after adjustment by IPTW. The proportion of SLE Responder Index 4 at 24 weeks was significantly higher in the telitacicept group (p = 0.031), but no significant difference was observed in 52 weeks follow-up data. More significant improvements were observed in telitacicept group for C4 and a larger decrease was observed in telitacicept group for IgA and IgM levels at 4 weeks. A better improvement of hemoglobin in anemia patients from the telitacicept group at 24 weeks was observed. There were no significant differences in kidney effectiveness and treatment-related adverse events differences between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients receiving telitacicept showed a higher SRI-4 rate compared to those receiving belimumab at 24 weeks. Due to the real-world nature of this study and the limitation of IPTW application, further extensive investigations in larger cohorts and head-to-head clinical trials are required to validate these findings. (Table presented.)
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212292182&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07266-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39680262; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-024-07266-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10067-024-07266-y; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10067-024-07266-y
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know