Use of Andromas and Bruker MALDI-TOF MS in the identification of Neisseria
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1435-4373, Vol: 37, Issue: 12, Page: 2273-2277
2018
- 13Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef4
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Through the past decade, MALDI-TOF MS has been recognized as a fast and robust tool for identification of most bacteria in clinical microbiology. However, the accuracy of this method to identify Neisseria species is still debated, and few data are available about commensal Neisseria species identification. In this study, we assessed two MALDI-TOF MS systems (Bruker Biotyper and Andromas) for the identification of 88, 18, and 29 isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Neisseria meningitidis, and commensal Neisseria species, respectively. All 88 isolates of N. gonorrhoeae were correctly identified using both systems, and most N. meningitidis and commensal Neisseria species were well identified: only 1/18 isolates of N. meningitidis was misidentified using Bruker Biotyper, and 1 isolate of Neisseria polysaccharea was misidentified as N. meningitidis using both systems. These results strengthen the possibility to use MALDI-TOF MS as a single method for Neisseria identification in routine, with excellent performance for N. gonorrhoeae identification. However, results should be interpreted prudently for N. meningitdis and commensal Neisseria species when isolated from genital and oropharyngeal samples where these both species can coexist.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053405994&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3368-6; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30178231; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10096-018-3368-6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3368-6; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10096-018-3368-6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know