Bounding the gap between the McCormick relaxation and the convex hull for bilinear functions
Mathematical Programming, ISSN: 1436-4646, Vol: 162, Issue: 1-2, Page: 523-535
2017
- 21Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We investigate how well the graph of a bilinear function b:[0,1]n→R can be approximated by its McCormick relaxation. In particular, we are interested in the smallest number c such that the difference between the concave upper bounding and convex lower bounding functions obtained from the McCormick relaxation approach is at most c times the difference between the concave and convex envelopes. Answering a question of Luedtke, Namazifar and Linderoth, we show that this factor c cannot be bounded by a constant independent of n. More precisely, we show that for a random bilinear function b we have asymptotically almost surely c⩾n/4. On the other hand, we prove that c⩽600n, which improves the linear upper bound proved by Luedtke, Namazifar and Linderoth. In addition, we present an alternative proof for a result of Misener, Smadbeck and Floudas characterizing functions b for which the McCormick relaxation is equal to the convex hull.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84973099072&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10107-016-1031-5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know