A decoupled first/second-order steps technique for nonconvex nonlinear unconstrained optimization with improved complexity bounds
Mathematical Programming, ISSN: 1436-4646, Vol: 179, Issue: 1-2, Page: 195-222
2020
- 7Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order to be provably convergent towards a second-order stationary point, optimization methods applied to nonconvex problems must necessarily exploit both first and second-order information. However, as revealed by recent complexity analyses of some of these methods, the overall effort to reach second-order points is significantly larger when compared to the one of approaching first-order ones. On the other hand, there are other algorithmic schemes, initially designed with first-order convergence in mind, that do not appear to maintain the same first-order performance when modified to take second-order information into account. In this paper, we propose a technique that separately computes first and second-order steps, and that globally converges to second-order stationary points: it consists in better connecting the steps to be taken and the stationarity criteria, potentially guaranteeing larger steps and decreases in the objective. Our approach is shown to lead to an improvement of the corresponding complexity bound with respect to the first-order optimality tolerance, while having a positive impact on the practical behavior. Although the applicability of our ideas is wider, we focus the presentation on trust-region methods with and without derivatives, and motivate in both cases the interest of our strategy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053558731&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10107-018-1328-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know