Challenges of diverse knowledge systems in landscape analysis of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia
Regional Environmental Change, ISSN: 1436-378X, Vol: 17, Issue: 3, Page: 767-776
2017
- 6Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Geographic information systems are a means to develop a common framework for the integration of a range of perspectives into natural resources management decisions. The incorporation of these perspectives presents more than a technical challenge—diverse knowledge systems make demands on the structure of geodatabases, the ways in which data are collected, held and interrogated, and the choices around which types of knowledge can and should be incorporated. Here, we investigate these questions in the context of Indigenous Yorta Yorta knowledge contributions to the management of a sensitive region of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia. Management of the Barmah-Millewa region and its natural resources is governed by a wide array of sometimes inconsistent policies with differing regulatory frameworks and management foci. We find that (1) appropriate collection, management and database design protocols require substantive intellectual property protections and (2) once in place, spatial analysis can support management decisions without revealing sensitive information. Importantly, these protocols support the effective and respectful participation of the Yorta Yorta community in management of this ecologically, economically and culturally important region.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994164564&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10113-016-1069-1
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know