Inflammation-based prognostic scores as indicators to select candidates for primary site resection followed by multimodal therapy among colorectal cancer patients with multiple metastases
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, ISSN: 1437-7772, Vol: 22, Issue: 4, Page: 758-766
2017
- 16Citations
- 35Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef4
- Captures35
- Readers35
- 35
Article Description
Background: Although patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) are often unable to undergo treatment after resection of primary tumors, identifying such patients before surgery is not easy. In this study, we evaluated the association among clinicopathological findings, survival outcomes, and ability to undergo multimodal therapy after primary tumor resection in patients with Stage IV CRC. Methods: We collected clinicopathological findings and preoperative laboratory data, including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and systemic inflammatory response markers for 92 patients who were treated for Stage IV CRC between 2005 and 2014. We used multivariate analysis on factors that affect prognosis and ability to undergo postoperative treatment. Results: Postoperative multimodal therapy improved overall survival (OS) significantly. Among serum markers, elevated CEA, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and modified Glasgow prognosis score (mGPS) were significant indicators of shorter OS. In multivariate analysis, low performance status (P = 0.003), undifferentiated histology type (P = 0.019), and elevated mGPS (P = 0.042) were independent predictors of worse prognosis; and older age (P = 0.016), right-sided colon cancer (P = 0.043), and elevated mGPS (P = 0.031) were independent risk factors for difficulty of introducing postoperative multimodal therapy. Conclusions: Preoperative mGPS is a useful objective indicator for CRC patients with multiple metastases who are able to undergo primary site resection followed by postoperative multimodal therapy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85015218068&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1113-2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28299463; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10147-017-1113-2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1113-2; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10147-017-1113-2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know