CO emission assessment of lightweight aggregate concrete using artificial lightweight and bottom ash particles
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, ISSN: 1611-8227, Vol: 24, Issue: 6, Page: 2172-2182
2022
- 7Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper proposes empirical models to straightforwardly assess the CO emissions of artificial lightweight aggregate concrete (ALWC) and bottom ash aggregate concrete (BAAC). The system boundary identified for the assessment was from the cradle to pre-construction, considering component materials, production, and transport of concrete. The CO emission was empirically formulated as a function of the unit binder content of concrete based on the analysis of a database, which includes 413 and 90 datasets for ALWC and BAAC, respectively. In addition, after applying ALWC and BAAC to concrete structures, their CO emissions are compared with those of normal-weight concrete (NWC) structures considering the reduction in the cross-sectional area of members resulting from the lower self-weight of concrete. In this assessment, the concrete used for all structural members is assumed to have been produced using ordinary Portland cement (OPC), featuring a 24 MPa compressive strength. Compared with the evaluated total CO emissions of the NWC structures, the ALWC and BAAC structures exhibited 36% and 24% higher CO emissions, respectively. This is because the CO emission of concrete is considerably dependent on the OPC content but marginally affected by the type of aggregate used.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know