Unraveling the environmental and economic impacts of fly ash utilization on mass concrete considering industry practices
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, ISSN: 1611-8227, Vol: 26, Issue: 3, Page: 1403-1417
2024
- 5Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In many emerging economies, the impact of fly ash utilization for mass concrete applications considering industry practices is yet to be quantified. This study quantifies the environmental and economic impacts of fly ash utilization in mass concrete, considering different mix design strategies in actual practice. Thirty-one (31) concrete mixtures from batching plants in the Philippines with 28-day strength design of 13.8–69.0 MPa have been analyzed using life cycle assessment (LCA) in SimaPro 9.3. Results show that when cement is replaced by 10, 15, and 20% of fly ash by weight, the global warming potential values are reduced by 8.5–9.4%, 8.5–20.7%, and 2.4–19.2%, respectively. Increased fly ash replacement shows a more beneficial impact on normal to high-strength than low-strength concrete mixtures in all 18 midpoint categories. Contribution analysis shows that aggregates significantly affect land use, while admixture affects marine eutrophication. A comparative LCA with mixtures from Thailand suggests that designing the compressive strength of fly ash concrete at 56 days will significantly improve its sustainability compared to a 28-day design. The economic benefit of using fly ash is greater for high-strength than for low-strength mixtures. This study will contribute to improving the sustainability of mass concrete production and benefit countries with similar practices.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know