Hierarchical disjoint principal component analysis
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, ISSN: 1863-818X, Vol: 107, Issue: 3, Page: 537-574
2023
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Dimension reduction, by means of Principal Component Analysis (PCA), is often employed to obtain a reduced set of components preserving the largest possible part of the total variance of the observed variables. Several methodologies have been proposed either to improve the interpretation of PCA results (e.g., by means of orthogonal, oblique rotations, shrinkage methods), or to model oblique components or factors with a hierarchical structure, such as in Bi-factor and High-Order Factor analyses. In this paper, we propose a new methodology, called Hierarchical Disjoint Principal Component Analysis (HierDPCA), that aims at building a hierarchy of disjoint principal components of maximum variance associated with disjoint groups of observed variables, from Q up to a unique, general one. HierDPCA also allows choosing the type of the relationship among disjoint principal components of two sequential levels, from the lowest upwards, by testing the component correlation per level and changing from a reflective to a formative approach when this correlation turns out to be not statistically significant. The methodology is formulated in a semi-parametric least-squares framework and a coordinate descent algorithm is proposed to estimate the model parameters. A simulation study and two real applications are illustrated to highlight the empirical properties of the proposed methodology.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know