Left-truncated health insurance claims data: theoretical review and empirical application
AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, ISSN: 1863-818X, Vol: 108, Issue: 1, Page: 31-68
2024
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
From the inventory of the health insurer AOK in 2004, we draw a sample of a quarter million people and follow each person’s health claims continuously until 2013. Our aim is to estimate the effect of a stroke on the dementia onset probability for Germans born in the first half of the 20th century. People deceased before 2004 are randomly left-truncated, and especially their number is unknown. Filtrations, modelling the missing data, enable circumventing the unknown number of truncated persons by using a conditional likelihood. Dementia onset after 2013 is a fixed right-censoring event. For each observed health history, Jacod’s formula yields its conditional likelihood contribution. Asymptotic normality of the estimated intensities is derived, related to a sample size definition including the number of truncated people. The standard error results from the asymptotic normality and is easily computable, despite the unknown sample size. The claims data reveal that after a stroke, with time measured in years, the intensity of dementia onset increases from 0.02 to 0.07. Using the independence of the two estimated intensities, a 95% confidence interval for their difference is [0.053, 0.057]. The effect halves when we extend the analysis to an age-inhomogeneous model, but does not change further when we additionally adjust for multi-morbidity.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know