Eye tracking-based evaluation of accessible and usable interactive systems: tool set of guidelines and methodological issues
Universal Access in the Information Society, ISSN: 1615-5297
2024
- 2Citations
- 24Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This paper describes some fundamentals and challenges in using eye tracking for the assessment of usability and accessibility in the fields in Human–Computer Interaction and Educational Computing. This technique has great potential since it allows considering human factors and individual differences in these areas. This non-invasive method, of physiological nature, allows to know, in an objective way, the visual behavior of the users when facing a user interface or educational material, allowing to infer conclusions related to psychological processes, such as attention or cognitive load. The purpose of this work is to propose a tool set of guidelines and measures, as well as a methodological approach, to be used in eye tracking assessments. This proposal is based on and validated by the authors’ previous experience and results in the application of this technique.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know