Dynamic displacement monitoring by integrating high-rate GNSS and accelerometer: on the possibility of downsampling GNSS data at reference stations
GPS Solutions, ISSN: 1521-1886, Vol: 27, Issue: 3
2023
- 10Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We combine accelerometer and asynchronous high-rate GNSS data to retrieve dynamic displacements. The method adopts relative GNSS positioning with observations of different sampling rates at rover and reference stations. The objective is to examine the feasibility of downsampling GNSS data at reference stations and thus, verify whether permanent GNSS networks collecting low-rate observations can serve as reference sites. The performance is assessed using a shake table to induce displacement waveforms. We show that the combined GNSS and accelerometer solution improves displacement accuracy by half compared to the GNSS-only one. Further accuracy improvement is obtained by applying the Rauch Tung Striebel (RTS) smoother. Consequently, it is reasonable to downsample high-rate GNSS data at the reference station even to a 2 s interval and preserve the displacement error below 1 mm. The results also reveal that a fusion of GNSS with accelerometer and RTS smoothing helps to mitigate the ephemeris error. With the assessment in the time–frequency domain, we show that the combined solution better recovers displacement waveforms than GNSS-only. For the former solution, the detected peak frequencies agree very well with those of the Linear Variable Differential Transformer responsible for providing the ground truth displacements, and the amplitude error does not exceed 0.5 mm. We conclude that the proposed approach based on asynchronous GNSS observations provides millimeter-level precision results and is better for reconciling dynamic displacements than a GNSS-only solution or simply integrating accelerometer data.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know