Metabolically engineered Escherichia coli for biotechnological production of four-carbon 1,4-dicarboxylic acids
Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, ISSN: 1367-5435, Vol: 38, Issue: 6, Page: 649-656
2011
- 31Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes31
- 31
- CrossRef27
- Captures50
- Readers50
- 50
Review Description
Confronted with inescapable exhaustion of the earth's fossil energy resources, the bio-based process to produce industrial chemicals is receiving significant interest. Biotechnological production of four-carbon 1,4-dicarboxylic acids (C4 diacids) from renewable plant biomass is a promising and attractive alternative to conventional chemistry routes. Although the C4 diacids pathway is well characterized and microorganisms able to convert biomass to these acids have been isolated and described, much still has to be done to make this process economically feasible. Metabolically engineered Escherichia coli has been developed as a biocatalyst to provide new processes for the biosynthesis of many valuable chemicals. However, E. coli does not naturally produce C4 diacids in large quantities. Rational strain development by metabolic engineering based on efficient genetic tools and detailed knowledge of metabolic pathways are crucial to successful production of these compounds. This review summarizes recent efforts and experiences devoted to metabolic engineering of the industrial model bacteria E. coli that led to efficient recombinant biocatalysts for the production of C4 diacids, including succinate, fumarate, malate, oxaloacetate, and aspartate, as well as the key limitations and challenges. Continued advancements in metabolic engineering will help to improve the titers, yields, and productivities of the C4 diacids discussed here. © Society for Industrial Microbiology 2010.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80051664276&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0913-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21113642; https://academic.oup.com/jimb/article/38/6/649/5994335; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0913-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10295-010-0913-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10295-010-0913-4
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know