Cultivar-mediated effects on apple–Dysaphis plantaginea interaction
Journal of Pest Science, ISSN: 1612-4766, Vol: 95, Issue: 3, Page: 1303-1315
2022
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The question of whether food webs are resource or predation controlled is crucial for the development of sustainable IPM strategies in agriculture. Many IPM studies focus on top–down control, while little is known about bottom–up effects. Here, we unravelled the bottom–up interactions between rosy apple aphid (RAA) Dysaphis plantaginea and 13 apple cultivars in north-eastern Belgium. Population dynamics, apple leaf damage, preference and performance measurements were used to determine the interactions between RAA and apple cultivars. Seasonal abundances and RAA-infested shoots were significantly affected by the cultivar. The cultivars Fuji, Granny Smith, Jonagold and Cripps Pink harboured clearly higher numbers of aphids compared to other cultivars, especially Red Delicious. Regarding leaf damage degree, Fuji was significantly the most impacted, while the lowest damage was recorded on Red Delicious. The potential apparent competition among apple cultivars was evaluated using RAA overlap diagrams. By acting as a potential source of RAA, a particular cultivar can considerably affect other nearby cultivars. In host selection bioassays, significant differences in the choice behaviour of RAA were found in the laboratory for different apple cultivars. Other important findings from the reproduction–offspring performance bioassays revealed that while Fuji stimulated high production of nymphs, their development remained retarded on Fuji, compared to especially Boskoop on which significantly lower numbers of nymphs occurred. Our study provides a promising insight into the importance of studying apple–RAA interactions within an eco-friendly RAA management tactic.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know