Bayesian active learning for parameter calibration of landslide run-out models
Landslides, ISSN: 1612-5118, Vol: 19, Issue: 8, Page: 2033-2045
2022
- 8Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Landslide run-out modeling is a powerful model-based decision support tool for landslide hazard assessment and mitigation. Most landslide run-out models contain parameters that cannot be directly measured but rely on back-analysis of past landslide events. As field data on past landslide events come with a certain measurement error, the community developed probabilistic calibration techniques. However, probabilistic parameter calibration of landslide run-out models is often hindered by high computational costs resulting from the long run time of a single simulation and the large number of required model runs. To address this computational challenge, this work proposes an efficient probabilistic parameter calibration method by integrating landslide run-out modeling, Bayesian inference, Gaussian process emulation, and active learning. Here, we present an extensive synthetic case study. The results show that our new method can reduce the number of necessary simulation runs from thousands to a few hundreds owing to Gaussian process emulation and active learning. It is therefore expected to advance the current practice of parameter calibration of landslide run-out models.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know