Screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk Chinese population using a mixed strategy with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy
Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, ISSN: 0012-3706, Vol: 50, Issue: 5, Page: 630-640
2007
- 18Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef12
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
PURPOSE: The Chinese population has been shown to have more distal colonic neoplasm and a higher sensitivity of sigmoidoscopic screening strategy for detecting advanced neoplasm compared with Western populations. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of the mixed screening strategy with sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the average-risk Chinese population. METHODS: Consecutive average-risk adults aged ≥50 years who underwent colonoscopy as part of a health checkup were enrolled. Data were analyzed in a hypothetical graded screening strategy using colonoscopy on patients older than a certain cutoff age or those with distal sentinel polyps. The sensitivity in detecting advanced colonic neoplasm and advanced proximal neoplasm as well as the number of colonoscopies reduced were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 2,106 persons eligible for analysis, 1,193 (56.6 percent) were males and 913 (43.4 percent) were females. If the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, and adenoma detected in the distal colon was the indication for subsequent colonoscopy, the detection rate for 1) advanced colonic neoplasm in the entire colon would be 94, 93.1, and 83.6 percent, respectively, and 2) advanced proximal neoplasm would be 84.8, 82.6, and 58.7 percent, respectively. The number of colonoscopic procedures could be reduced by 28, 48, and 65 percent if the cutoff ages were 55, 60, and 65 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The mixed screening strategy using a cutoff age at 60 years and distal adenoma as the sentinel lesion is an effective screening program in the average-risk Chinese population. © 2007 The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34249883029&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0857-y; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297552; https://journals.lww.com/00003453-200750050-00009; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10350-006-0857-y; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10350-006-0857-y; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0857-y; https://journals.lww.com/dcrjournal/Abstract/2007/50050/Screening_for_Colorectal_Cancer_in_Average_Risk.9.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know