Risk factors for pterygium recurrence after limbal-conjunctival autografting: a retrospective, single-centre investigation
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology, ISSN: 1613-2246, Vol: 62, Issue: 3, Page: 349-356
2018
- 18Citations
- 49Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef9
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
Article Description
Purpose: To determine the risk factors related to recurrence of pterygium after pterygium excision with limbal-conjunctival autograft. Study design: Retrospective, observational case series. Methods: The current study included 310 patients who underwent surgical removal of pterygium using limbal-conjunctival autografting. All surgery was performed by the same surgeon at a single Hospital from 2006 to 2011. Preoperative and postoperative patient data were collected. The patients were summoned to follow-up examinations. Procedures with at least 12 months of follow-up were included in the final analysis. Potential risk factors for pterygium recurrence were determined by Cox proportional-hazard linear analysis and recurrence-free survival time was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method. Results: The overall recurrence rate was 5.2% during an average follow-up time of 20.1±8.6 months (range, 12–37 months). According to Kaplan–Meier evaluation, the estimated time to recurrence was 34.2 ± 0.5 months (95% confidence interval 33.3–35.0 months) for the whole population. Multivariate analysis showed that age < 45 years old (RR = 3.582, 95% CI 1.984–13.044, P = 0.047), recurrent type of pterygia (RR = 4.856, 95% CI 1.794–13.142, P = 0.002), and vertical size of pterygium > 6.7 mm (RR = 2.529, 95% CI 1.053–6.075, P = 0.038) were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that young age, recurrent type of pterygia, and larger pterygial tissue are risk factors for pterygium recurrence after surgical excision. Hence, early excision of pterygium is recommended to decrease the recurrence rate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044091952&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10384-018-0582-9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29549462; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10384-018-0582-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10384-018-0582-9; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10384-018-0582-9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know