PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Patterns of bird-bacteria associations

EcoHealth, ISSN: 1612-9210, Vol: 15, Issue: 3, Page: 627-641
2018
  • 24
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 87
    Captures
  • 3
    Mentions
  • 337
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    24
  • Captures
    87
  • Mentions
    3
    • News Mentions
      3
      • 3
  • Social Media
    337
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      337
      • Facebook
        337

Most Recent News

Why you may need to encourage social distancing around your bird feeder

People in Britain feed up to 196 million birds a year with 60,000 tonnes of bird food, at a total cost of £300 million. All those garden feeders have helped boost populations of dozens of bird species, including the garden regular, the blue tit, whose numbers have increased by 26% in the last 50 years.

Article Description

Birds, with their broad geographic ranges and close association with humans, have historically played an important role as carriers of human disease and as reservoirs for drug-resistant bacteria. Here, we examine scientific literature over a 15-year timespan to identify reported avian-bacterial associations and factors that may impact zoonotic disease emergence by classifying traits of bird species and their bacteria. We find that the majority of wild birds studied were migratory, in temperate habitats, and in the order Passeriformes. The highest diversity of bacteria was found on birds in natural habitats. The most frequently reported bacteria were Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, and Campylobacter jejuni. Of the bacteria species reported, 54% have shown pathogenicity toward humans. Percentage-wise, more pathogens were found in tropical (vs. temperate) habitats and natural (vs. suburban, urban, or agricultural) habitats. Yet, only 22% were tested for antibiotic resistance, and of those tested, 75% of bacteria species were resistant to at least one antibiotic. There were no significant patterns of antibiotic resistance in migratory versus non-migratory birds, temperate versus tropical areas, or different habitats. We discuss biases in detection and representation, and suggest a need for increased sampling in non-temperate zones and in a wider range of avian species.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know