Comparison of sonographic findings between pediatric patients with mediastinitis and without mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, ISSN: 1613-2254, Vol: 47, Issue: 4, Page: 625-633
2020
- 8Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef4
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Purpose: To compare the sonographic findings between pediatric patients with/without mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery. Methods: We included 18 pediatric patients with suspected mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery who underwent ultrasound. They were divided into two groups according to the presence of mediastinitis, confirmed by positive bacterial culture from the mediastinum (number with/without mediastinitis = 5/13). The following sonographic findings were compared between the groups: (1) increased parasternal fat echogenicity and (2) retrosternal mediastinal fluid collection. Additionally, sex, age, and the interval between surgery and ultrasound examination were also compared. Fisher’s exact and Mann–Whitney U tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results: A significant difference was observed between patients with and without mediastinitis in the presence of increased fat echogenicity around the sternum (present/absent with mediastinitis vs. present/absent without mediastinitis: 5/0 vs. 3/10, respectively; P = 0.007) and retrosternal mediastinal fluid collection (5/0 vs. 2/11, respectively; P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in sex (male/female; 3/2 vs. 6/7; P > 0.999); age (months; 12.6 ± 9.4 (range, 1–22) vs. 6.9 ± 5.4 (range, 1–21); P = 0.336); and interval between surgery and ultrasound examination (days; 12.8 ± 7.2 (range, 6–20) vs. 19.1 ± 14.9 (range, 1–45); P = 0.443). Conclusion: Although our cohort was small, none of the patients without increased parasternal fat echogenicity or mediastinal fluid collection was diagnosed with mediastinitis. These sonographic findings may help identify the possible presence of mediastinitis. Ultrasound may be the modality of first choice to evaluate pediatric patients for mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086362404&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01029-3; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32535724; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10396-020-01029-3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10396-020-01029-3; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10396-020-01029-3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know