Small bowel sarcoma: Analysis of survival from the National Cancer Data Base
Annals of Surgical Oncology, ISSN: 1068-9265, Vol: 8, Issue: 6, Page: 496-508
2001
- 47Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef37
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 11
Article Description
Background: Small bowel sarcomas (SBS) are rare, accounting for 10% of small bowel cancers. As a result, few studies of SBS have had enough patients to accurately define their natural history and to determine the factors that have an impact on patient survival. The objective of this study was to examine patient and tumor factors in SBS and to determine prognostic factors for disease-specific survival (DSS) using the National Cancer Data Base. Methods: Data from the National Cancer Data Base for patients diagnosed with primary SBS between 1985 and 1995 were analyzed. The χ statistic was used to determine significant differences between groups of patient, tumor, and treatment factors. DSS was calculated for patients diagnosed between 1985 and 1990. Significant differences in survival were determined using the Wilcoxon statistic for univariate analyses and by Cox regression in multivariate analyses. Results: Of 14,253 small bowel tumors diagnosed between 1985 and 1995, sarcomas represented 10.1%. Overall, 5-year DSS was 38.9%, with a median survival of 34.1 months (n = 590). By univariate analysis, patient age, sex, tumor size, tumor grade, histologic type, general summary stage, nodal status, and whether cancer-directed surgery was performed were significantly correlated with DSS. In multivariate analysis, tumor size <5 cm, leiomyosarcoma histology, and localized disease were found to be significant favorable prognostic factors for DSS. Conclusions: SBS are rare tumors that are challenging in terms of their histopathologic classification, grading, and staging. Patients with SBS were treated predominantly by surgery, with a minority receiving adjuvant therapy. Tumor size, histologic type, and general summary stage were independent prognostic factors for 5-year DSS in patients with SBS, which is improved relative to 5-year DSS seen in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0034933863&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/aso.2001.8.6.496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11456049; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; http://www.annalssurgicaloncology.org/cgi/doi/10.1245/aso.2001.8.6.496; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10434-001-0496-4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1245/aso.2001.8.6.496
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know