Challenges and Perspectives for Future Considerations in the Bioengineering of a Bioartificial Pancreas
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, ISSN: 1573-9686, Vol: 52, Issue: 7, Page: 1795-1803
2024
- 3Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures7
- Readers7
Review Description
There is an unrelenting interest in the development of a reliable bioartificial pancreas construct since the first description of this technology of encapsulated islets by Lim and Sun in 1980 because it promised to be a curative treatment for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM). Despite the promise of the concept of encapsulated islets, there are still some challenges that impede the full realization of the clinical potential of the technology. In this review, we will first present the justification for continued research and development of this technology. Next, we will review key barriers that impede progress in this field and discuss strategies that can be used to design a reliable construct capable of effective long-term performance after transplantation in diabetic patients. Finally, we will share our perspectives on areas of additional work for future research and development of the technology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85149976678&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03180-7; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36913086; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-023-03180-7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03180-7; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10439-023-03180-7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know