Robustness of priority deriving methods for pairwise comparison matrices against rank reversal: a probabilistic approach
Annals of Operations Research, ISSN: 1572-9338, Vol: 333, Issue: 1, Page: 249-273
2024
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This work aims to answer the natural question of how probable it is that a given method produces rank reversal in a priority vector (PV) if a decision maker (DM) introduces perturbations to the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) under concern. We focus primarily on the concept of robustness against rank reversal, independent of specific methods, and provide an in-depth statistical insight into the application of the Monte Carlo (MC) approach in this context. This concept is applied to three selected methods, with a special emphasis on scenarios where a method may not provide outputs for all possible PCMs. All results presented in this work are replicable using our open-source implementation.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know