Differential evolution with infeasible-guiding mutation operators for constrained multi-objective optimization
Applied Intelligence, ISSN: 1573-7497, Vol: 50, Issue: 12, Page: 4459-4481
2020
- 18Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs) are common in engineering design fields. To solve such problems effectively, this paper proposes a new differential evolution variant named IMDE with infeasible-guiding mutation operators and a multistrategy technique. In IMDE, an infeasible solution with lower objective values is maintained for each individual in the main population, and this infeasible solution is then incorporated into some common differential evolution’s mutation operators to guide the search toward the region with promising objective values. Moreover, multiple mutation strategies and control parameters are adopted during the trial vector generation procedure to enhance both the convergence and the diversity of differential evolution. The superior performance of IMDE is validated via comparisons with some state-of-the-art constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms over 3 sets of artificial benchmarks and 4 widely used engineering design problems. The experiments show that IMDE outperforms other algorithms or obtains similar results. It is an effective approach for solving CMOPs, basically due to the use of infeasible-guiding mutation operators and multiple strategies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85088262338&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0; https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0.pdf; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-020-01733-0
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know