Feature selection using three-stage heuristic measures based on mutual fuzzy granularities
Applied Intelligence, ISSN: 1573-7497, Vol: 54, Issue: 2, Page: 1445-1473
2024
- 5Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
Article Description
Mutual information is fundamental for feature selection, and relevant conditional and joint mutual fuzzy granularities (MFGs) characterize feature correlation and redundancy in fuzzy decision systems, respectively. Recently, conditional MFGs have been utilized to generate three-stage heuristic measures, and thus, two feature selection algorithms (called GFMRI-FS and NGFMRI-FS) have emerged. However, these methods emphasize correlation connections but neglect redundancy deletion, thus the approach can be improved. In this paper, a joint MFG with redundant feature information is supplemented to reasonably modify existing heuristic measures, and new three-stage heuristic measures are constructed to obtain two improved selection algorithms (called C-GFMRI-FS and C-NGFMRI-FS). First, the measurement mechanisms of the MFGs are analyzed, and three-stage correctional heuristic measures are established to acquire the dependency semantics, bound combinations, size relationships, theoretical extensions, applied optimization, parametric monotonicity, and systematic algorithms. Then, the three-stage current and correctional heuristic measures obtain granulation monotonicity/certainty and nonmonotonicity/uncertainty, respectively, as well as uncertainty fluctuations on feature-dynamic subset chains. Furthermore, feature selection is investigated by correctional heuristic measures, and two selection algorithms (i.e., C-GFMRI-FS and C-NGFMRI-FS) are designed. Finally, table examples and data experiments validate the uncertainty heuristic measures and feature selection algorithms; accordingly, C-GFMRI-FS and C-NGFMRI-FS outperform GFMRI-FS and NGFMRI-FS and achieve better classification results. This study fuses conditional and joint MFGs to make systematic improvements in heuristic measurements and feature selection, thus facilitating data learning.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know