Effects and economic viability of earthworm meal (Eisenia andrei) and zeolite in diets for Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings
Aquaculture International, ISSN: 1573-143X, Vol: 33, Issue: 1
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
This study evaluated inclusion levels (0, 3.5, 7, and 10.5%) of earthworm meal (Eisenia andrei) in diets for GIFT Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings with and without 2% zeolite. The experiment used a 4 × 2 factorial design with three replicates, involving 24 tanks, each stocked with seven fish (2.672 ± 0.22 g). Water quality parameters, growth performance, proximate composition of fish carcass and biometric indices were analyzed, along with an economic assessment. Results showed that zeolite significantly reduced nitrogenous compounds and coliforms in water (P < 0.05). Earthworm meal did not affect water quality (P > 0.05). However, 7% and 10.5% inclusion of earthworm meal significantly improved growth performance (P < 0.05), including final body weight, weight gain, feed conversion ratio, feed efficiency, specific growth rate, protein efficiency ratio, and condition factor. Zeolite did not affect growth performance (P > 0.05). Proximate composition and biometric indices were not significantly impacted by either product (P > 0.05), except for lower carcass ether extract with zeolite and higher protein and energy retention coefficient with 7% and 10% earthworm meal (P < 0.05). Economically, diets with earthworm meal were more expensive (USD 25.05/kg), but the viable price was determined to be USD 1.27/kg, without negatively affecting economic indices. Zeolite did not significantly impact other economic parameters (P > 0.05). In conclusion, earthworm meals can be added to Nile tilapia diets at 7% to 10.5% to enhance growth performance, with 7% recommended for cost considerations. Zeolite at 2% can improve water quality without affecting production costs.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know